Leadership challenges; In a multi-cultural group/team
Defining Communication in multicultural teams
The ability to explain or accept the reception of information in conjunction with others is known as team communication, which is defined as the mechanism by which information is shared between two or more team members. Communication is difficult enough in same-cultural teams, but it becomes much more difficult in multicultural groups. Members of a team have varying attitudes, behaviours, and perceptions; in multicultural teams, these variations are especially pronounced due to the diversity of cultural backgrounds.
In multicultural teams, a leader must be aware of cultural diversity and predict the effects of cultural diversity on the team.
Where a problem requires both communication and leadership, it's important to consider the source of the problem and who is coping with it. Typically, multicultural team analysis is conducted from the viewpoint of the team members or from the perspective of the team's leader or manager. A communication challenge is described as a challenge in which team 13 members have difficulty communicating with other team members. It would be considered a leadership challenge if the challenge includes team members who have communication problems with a leader. When the challenge involves a leader who is having trouble communicating with his or her team, it will be considered a leadership challenge.
The biggest challenge, according to Globcom's example, is virtual communication. Virtual teams are groups of people that collaborate closely in geographically scattered work groups and may be located in various time zones or countries. We collaborate using cutting-edge information and networking technology such as video calls and e-mail. Since communication in multicultural virtual teams is minimal, team members must be able to trust one another. To be competitive, multicultural virtual teams must have a high level of trust.Multicultural virtual teams have no shared history or future, the team is culturally diverse, and team members come from various geographic backgrounds, and there is no physical contact between team members. Teams with high levels of trust are better able to deal with the virtual environment's confusion, ambiguity, and expectation than teams with low levels of trust. Our teams face the following challenges: management of concerns, inability to meet face-to-face, lack of commitment and engagement, and decision-making issues.Students from all nations, on the other hand, showed a moderate level of confidence, and trust was not a major issue. The participants' similar ages, functional histories, and educational levels can explain this.
Cohesion of the community
Despite the fact that cohesion is not a communication problem in and of itself, weak cohesion in groups is a significant consequence of a lack of communication. In order to perform well, group cohesion is a necessary component of teamwork. “A complex mechanism that is embodied in a group's tendency to stay together and remain together in the pursuit of its instrumental goals and/or for the fulfilment of participant affective needs,” according to the definition. Multicultural teams' community cohesion is affected by cultural diversity.Because of the complexities of communication in multicultural teams, it's difficult for them to become a cohesive unit and produce the results that come with it. Culturally homogeneous teams have higher levels of cohesiveness than culturally heterogeneous teams. Individualists, on the other hand, are more likely to take advantage of the community's joint effort to follow their own interests, while collectivists are better at cooperating because they enjoy working in a group and value the team's goals. Miscommunication and poor group performance result from these differing views of what constitutes acceptable team behaviour.
Challenges to leadership
Managing multicultural teams comes with its own collection of difficulties and challenges. Not only will you have to deal with language barriers, but you'll also have to deal with cultural and training issues. What makes sense to Western-culture workers may not make sense to Eastern-culture hires. We often misinterpret the behaviour of people from other cultures, wasting precious time in the process of resolving misunderstandings and setting standards. All of these difficulties necessitate careful consideration, cultural comprehension and dexterity, and a highly diplomatic approach.
1. Language Disparity
The terms we use and the way we speak are instruments we use to communicate our emotions, aspirations, and dreams. We are all bound by our native tongue, which makes moving to a foreign nation where the majority of the population speaks a different language challenging. Consider leading a multicultural team of members who speak a variety of languages.
You must ensure that not only do they grasp company processes and practises, but that they also have an efficient means of interacting with one another. To claim that this job is difficult is an understatement.Around the same time, certain workers' primary language at work may be their second or third language, so colloquialisms may be lost on them.
Furthermore, they can mistakenly misinterpret slang and jokes because they view them in a literal sense. Not to mention, team members who are unfamiliar with the office's language can feel out of place and less likely to express their opinions.
Solution:
Figure out a way to communicate your messages in a way that everyone understands. Multilingual translators may be incorporated into the teams. You could also have ongoing language lessons in the company's native tongue. The goal is for every member of the team to feel included and respected. Also, strive not to be prejudiced against team members who speak our native tongue fluently. Regardless of the language they speak, everyone should have the impression that they are handled equally.
2. Variations in culture
People from Eastern cultures would have different cultural standards than those from Western cultures, similar to the language barrier. A Western boss, for example, can come across as overbearing, loud, or blunt to a team member from Japan or other Asian countries, where demands are made more respectfully and indirectly.
An employee from a Western culture, on the other hand, would be more likely to speak up if something doesn't sound right, as opposed to someone from an Eastern culture who may have been conditioned to never challenge the boss, even if they are incorrect.
These cultural differences can cause misunderstanding among team members and, in the worst-case scenario, a lack of cohesiveness.
Solution:
Take the time to think about your team members' various cultural values, how they interpret assertiveness, and how to interact effectively with them. Encourage your staff to learn about the backgrounds of their coworkers as well.
3. Technical Problems
Many of today's most common software offerings are familiar to an employee from the United States. They would only need minimal training in this area. An employee from a more rural area of another world, such as China, on the other hand, might not be as familiar with popular American technology and software. Similarly, while it is assumed that a member of the West team is well-versed in Google, it may be entirely alien to anyone from China, where Baidu is the dominant search engine.
Solution: Simply inquire about which technologies they are familiar with and which may benefit from additional training. Then, for those who need it, have lessons or an online training course to ensure that the whole team is up to date and on the same page.
4. The method of making a decision
Different cultures have different decision-making styles. Managers in the United States are required to make decisions quickly, while managers in other societies take their time to conduct due diligence, collect additional details, and also consult team members to ensure that the decision is reached unanimously. Furthermore, in some cultures, managers are held in high regard, and their decisions are never challenged by workers, even though they are incorrect. So, how can choices be taken in a culturally diverse world to prevent contradictory situations?
Solution: Staff would have varying levels of standards. What you can do is make sure that every member of your multicultural team is aware of your decision-making process.
Learn about the differences between each member of your team, and then decide how decisions will be carried out. Next, speak to and employee one-on-one and find out how they feel about the management style and decision-making method to see if they are happy with it.
5. Contact styles: Aggression and Tone
Different cultures have different contact styles. As previously said, American managers are more militant and direct than their Easter counterparts. This will come across as too blunt to certain team members. This can also apply to each member of your multicultural team's cultural norms.
Solution
It's impossible to change the look overnight. What you can do is make sure that every member of your multicultural team is aware of your decision-making process. Then, make it a priority to speak with and employee one-on-one and find out how they feel about your management style and whether or not they are comfortable with it.
6. The difficulty of empowering a multicultural team
Motivation can be viewed differently in different cultures. What may be inspiring to you may be demotivating to someone from a different culture. Trying to impose a universal incentive and reward system based on your company's norms and culture can backfire, resulting in a decrease in employee satisfaction and productivity. Similarly, some people do much better when they are left to work out how to get the job done on their own, while people from other cultures will find themselves groping in the dark unless the boss lays out a straightforward path for them to follow.
Solution: Talk to people from various cultures individually to find out what motivates them and how much manager intervention they are comfortable with. Come to an agreement with them about the anticipated outcomes if their recommendations are followed, and monitor the effects.
Last but not least
Managing multiracial teams isn't for the faint of heart. It necessitates knowledge, patience, and diplomacy. If you want to be understood, first learn to understand, as the old adage goes.
Comments
Post a Comment